Diomedeidae
The
weekend started with Musk Ducks in the harbour. I saw them from the road, a
pair of them: dark and flat on the grey water, only five metres offshore from a
narrow beach, birds of lakes incongruous there in the sea. The immensity of the town’s aluminium smelter
was behind them. I didn’t know what they
were at first but I had an inkling, a sense or an instinct for their identity,
and as I skirted the beach I willed the male of the pair to lift his head from
its resting position beneath his wing and so show me the defining throat-pouch
that would confirm beyond doubt the animal I was looking at.
The
Musk Duck (Biziura lobata) is sui generis: found only in Australia, and unrelated to any other duck in
this country, in fact related only to long-extinct New Zealand species, it is in a
genus by itself. It’s a heavy duck, so
heavy that it must starve itself before it can fly; perhaps unsurprisingly, it
rarely chooses to do so. Nor is it inclined
to go on the land, as other ducks do. It
spends most of its life on the water, where it sits low to the surface,
metal-grey like the ironclad warships of the nineteenth century. It’s large for a duck, sixty centimetres or
so from tip to tail, and its body is broad, and its beak is stout, and it’s an
excellent diver and swimmer; the first time I ever saw one, in Tidbinbilla
Nature Reserve near Canberra, it was beneath the water and I thought at first
that I was seeing a Platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus).
That
Musk Duck had been in an enclosure, though – albeit an unusually spacious
one. The pair I saw in the shadows of
the smelter were the first wild Musk Ducks I’d ever seen. They were in Portland, on the very eastern
edge of the Great Australian Bight and about as far west along the Victorian
coast as you can go without crossing into South Australia. I was there with a good friend, her infant
son, and her mother-in-law (also an old family friend). Nobody had told me that there would be Musk
Ducks in Portland. We’d travelled there, three or more hours
drive from Melbourne, because I’d read that it
was the best place in Victoria
from which to see whales.
In
particular I’d read that in the summer months there was a possibility – remote,
but a possibility – of seeing Blue Whales (Balaenoptera musculus). The largest animal that have ever lived on
the surface of the earth, at least as far as we know, even at a distance you
can identify a Blue Whale – so I read – by the fact that its water spout goes
some twelve metres into the air. All you have to do is scan the ocean, and
hope.
The
Blue Whales come to Portland
– come to the Bight in general – because they’re drawn by a phenomenon called
the Bonney Upwelling. This brings cold,
nutrient-rich water from Antarctica up to the surface of the ocean, just
offshore from mainland southern Australia;
feeding on the nutrients are microscopic algae; feeding on the algae are Krill
(Euphausiacea); feeding on the krill are Blue Whales.
Feeding
on the Krill, also, are fish, and the fish in turn are devoured by other
animals. The waters around Portland are
home to several thousand Australasian Gannets (Morus serrator), a
population so robustly healthy that some several years ago it overflowed from
its home on Lawrence Rocks, two kilometres offshore, and colonised Point
Danger, just six kilometres from Portland – the only mainland colony of these
birds in Australia. Mainland Australia’s largest population of seals, too, is
found in the area: two populations, really, separate colonies of Australian Fur
Seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) and New Zealand Fur Seals (Arctocephalus
forsteri) occupying secluded rocks far below the cliffs of Cape Bridgewater,
about twenty kilometres west of Portland. Numerous seabirds scour the waves: Gulls (Laridae),
Terns (Sternidae), Petrels and Shearwaters (Procellariiformes).
Albatrosses. Only a week or two before going to Portland I
read that they could frequently be seen from the region’s cliffs and headlands
and I immediately realised that if I saw an Albatross it would be just as
exciting for me as if I saw a whale – even more exciting than seeing Musk
Ducks, for which I’d been unprepared.
I’ve long adored birds – most animals lovers do, I think, birds being
the most easily observed of all the higher animals – and Albatrosses are birds par
excellence. Only the Swifts (Apodidae)
are so well suited to flight; Albatrosses are, in a manner of speaking, Swifts
the size of Eagles.
They’re
pelagic, too, spending most of their lives flying above the remotest parts of
the deepest oceans. Fishermen see them;
sailors see them; the rest of us probably never will, unless we seek them
out. They can most readily be seen on
the remote islands on which they nest – but if an animal can be seen the
“wrong” way then seeing an Albatross ashore, grounded and clumsy, must surely
be seeing it the wrong way. An Albatross
at rest, terrestrial, is not the bird that inspired the American ornithologist
Robert Cushman Murphy to exclaim in 1912 “I now belong to a higher cult of
mortal, for I have seen the albatross”.
When I
saw the Albatross, when I joined that cult – when my life changed, for that’s
how it felt – the bird was flying. I was
standing near the Blowhole, a coastal feature beyond Cape Bridgewater,
and I was as I had been for days mesmerised by the steady heaving of the
Southern Ocean. You see by looking, and
you look by staring; I was staring at the water, one hundred metres below me
and somewhere between shore and horizon, and hoping to see something.
When I
saw the Albatross, and raised my binoculars to it, and watched it bank and
turn, showing me back and then belly, back and then belly, long stiff wings
never beating – I gasped. I sighed. I shouted out loud in joy and exhiliration to
myself. How do you describe the flight
of an Albatross? It’s a dance. It’s a pas de deux in which one of the
partners is utterly indifferent. As the
ocean moves, so moves the Albatross – and yet not entirely, not exactly. The Albatross rises with each wave’s rise,
descends with each wave’s fall, as if held on a wire only a few inches long
connecting it to the surface of the ocean – and yet scanning the ocean I found
to my surprise that I could pick out the Albatrosses (Albatrosses! Eventually I saw four or five of them, each
alone) easily, for they moved at cross-purposes to the sea: as the waves pulled
unceasingly towards the land, the Albatrosses circled above them, as if wiping
them clean – or scouring them, as we say, for food, for that’s what they were
doing. An Albatross in flight is a
hungry Albatross. So great was the
movement of the sea, so uniform in its immensity, that even a bird – a large
bird, with a two metre wingspan, but tiny by comparison – stood out instantly
for the way it moved in its own patterns.
The Albatrosses were at once bound to the ocean – depending on the
miniature thermals lifting of its waves to give them lift – and thrillingly
liberated from it.
I don’t
know to which species the Albatrosses I saw belonged – they were Albatrosses,
and that’s all that mattered to me – but the most commonly reported Albatrosses
in the Portland area are the Black-browed Albatross (Thalassarche
melanophrys) and the Shy Albatross (Thalassarche cauta). Both are mollymawks, a group of medium-sized
Albatrosses. The mollymawks boast more
species in their ranks than any other single group of Albatrosses, and all of
those species belong to the same genus, Thalassarche. The genus was named by the German
ornithologist Ludwig Reichenbach in 1853; the name means “from the sea” or
“having command of the sea”, and it could not be more apt. Yet mollymawk, too, has a meaning: it’s a
derivation of a Dutch name meaning “foolish gull”. From foolish gull to commander of the sea –
between them these two names encompass our entire attitude to nature. In the abstract we are in admiration, even
awe, of wild animals – but this is tempered by a more concrete disdain. It’s a signal feature of the human intellect
that we can hold these two attitudes in our minds at the same time. We love the idea of wild animals – we’re just
not prepared for the inconvenience of actually sharing a planet with them. Albatrosses, those foolish birds, those
children of the sea, circle the waves looking for fish; they are animals, and
will take easy food when they can. They
are killed in their tens of thousands every year on long-line fishing hooks, in
trawler nets, by floating rubbish which they mistake for food.
When I watched the last of the handful of
Albatrosses that I saw that weekend in Portland,
just a month ago as I write this, it was isolated in the narrow field of my
binoculars. It was circling, unwavering,
effortless, long wings shining in the sun, and I held it in my gaze until my
arms grew tired. The only sound I could
hear was the sound of the ocean, heaving and surging, seemingly limitless. I felt as if I was looking not through
binoculars but through the looking-glass, into another world; I felt that no
two beings could be more disconnected from each-other than me, flat-footed on a
rocky cliff, and the Albatross, suspended above the waves and held by nothing
more than air. Yet there was an invisible wire connecting us, too, and it can
never be broken. Humans touch the world as no other animal ever has or
can. This is to our immense gain, and
the Albatross’s great peril.
Image sourced from http://en.wikipedia.org